Playing The Middle With Owens & Minor

Posted: Oct 09, 2008 14:38 PM by Gregory S. Davis
Tickers in this Article: CAH, GOOG, KO, MCK, OMI, SPY

The pathway to profitability for suppliers may often involve removing the middleman. Medical distributors like Owens & Minor (NYSE:OMI) have become adept at playing that middle role between medical suppliers and healthcare providers. A closer look at Owens & Minor and the volatility measure beta will give investors an idea and a tool that can be used to build a defensive portfolio. (For more information about "beta" check out Beta: Know The Risk.)

Get Free Stock Analysis By Email

Medical Supplier
Owens & Minor recently announced its receipt of federal regulatory approval to complete its acquisition of The Burrows, a privately held Chicago-based distributor of medical and surgical supplies. Owens & Minor is already one of the country's largest medical and surgical suppliers primarily serving acute-care hospitals. Typical products include disposable gloves, needles and syringes, sterile procedure trays and wound-closure products. The company typically has three- to five-year contracts with its customers. Its ability to secure contracts and its 2006 acquisition of the McKesson (NYSE:MCK) medical-surgical distribution business helped the medical supplier increase revenues 22.9% to $6.8 billion in 2007.

Notes On Beta
Beta can be thought of as a measure of volatility assigned to each stock against a broad index like the S&P 500. Let’s say the S&P 500 rises 5% and on the same day a stock rises 5%. That stock would have a beta equal to “1” since it mirrors the index's performance. A relatively young tech company like Google (Nasdaq:GOOG) has a higher beta of 2.14, suggesting greater market volatility, while an older and less-volatile Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) has a beta of 0.48. A stock with a negative beta suggests it would move in the opposite direction of the broad index. (Speaking of the S&P 500, be sure to check out How Can I Buy An S&P 500 Fund?)

Medical Suppliers' Beta
Owens & Minor has a beta of 0.1, suggesting that if the S&P 500 falls 30%, the company should only fall approximately 3%. Looking at returns since the beginning of the year reveals that Owens & Minor has fallen less than 1%, while the SPDRS S&P 500 Index ETF (AMEX:SPY) has fallen 32.72%. Conversely, when the S&P 500 Index is rising, Owens & Minor, given its low beta, should not do as well. Competitors including Cardinal Health (NYSE:CAH) and McKesson (NYSE:MCK) have betas of 1.0 and 0.6. Cardinal Health is down 24.58% while McKesson is also down 31.47% since the beginning of the year.

Final Thoughts
Beta alone cannot predict the performance of a stock, but it can be used as a reference point when building a portfolio. The position Owens & Minor holds between suppliers and acute-care providers is a pivotal one that has proven to be profitable. Investors should search for other companies benefiting from playing in the middle.


By Gregory S. Davis

Gregory S. Davis is the owner of G. Davis Capital, a Registered Investment Advisor with the state of North Carolina dedicated to providing independent investment research and education. His core methodology for choosing investments includes going against emotion eliciting headlines while focusing on asset diversification. G. Davis Capital also publishes the ETF education website, ETFReady.com . Gregory is a graduate of the Wharton School of Business and he has received an MBA from Bowie State University.
Rate this Article:  Your Rating:    Overall Rating: Vote Now!
Related Links
Marketplace
Related Links
Trading Center
New! The Financial Edge
Special Offers
Sponsored Links
add investopedia foot